Simulation of composite Puck damage in 3d continuum element in Abaqus (UMAT-USDFLD-VUMAT)

(18 customer reviews)

 250.0

The Puck criterion is an essential damage model for composite materials, considering both fiber and matrix failures simultaneously. It provides a practical way to predict the onset of damage in composites under various loading conditions. This training package is focused on simulating composite PUCK damage in 3D continuum elements using UMAT, VUMAT, and USDFLD subroutines in Abaqus. It covers different types of failure in composites, including fiber failure, matrix cracking, delamination, and interfacial failure, as well as criteria for predicting failure modes in composites that are dependent or not dependent on each other, such as the Tsai-Wu and Tsai-Hill criterion, respectively. Additionally, the package covers composites’ most commonly used damage criteria, including the Puck criterion. The package provides step-by-step guidance on simulating composite Puck damage using each of the subroutines mentioned above in Abaqus.

 

Expert

Included

.for

,

.inp

,

video file

Tutorial video duration

108 minutes

language

English

Level

Package Type

Software version

Applicable to all versions

Add-on

The option's price will be set post-order, requiring negotiation with support for confirmation.

The option's price will be set post-order, requiring negotiation with support for confirmation.
Product price:  250.0
Total options:
Order total:
48 People watching this product now!

Frequently Bought Together

Puck damage criterion | Puck failure criterion + Woven composite damage + 3D continuum Composite Damage | Progressive hashin damage + UMAT Hashin 3d + Composite Fatigue Subroutine + unidirectional composite fatigue VUMAT tutorial + unidirectional composite damage tutorial
Price for all: Original price was: € 2110.0.Current price is: € 1582.5. Save  527.5
Description

Puck criteria in 3D continuum element

The use of the Puck criterion in simulating composite PUCK damage in 3D continuum elements in Abaqus allows for accurate and efficient predictions of composite failure.

Compared to other failure criteria, such as the Hashin failure criteria, the Puck criterion has some advantages in predicting composite damage and failure behavior. The Hashin criterion only considers the failure of individual layers or plies in a composite material without considering the interactions between layers.

This training package is designed to provide comprehensive guidance on simulating composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements using UMAT, VUMAT, and USDFLD subroutines in Abaqus. The package covers a range of different types of failure in composites, including fiber failure, matrix cracking, delamination, and interfacial failure.

By the end of this training package, learners will thoroughly understand how to simulate composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements using UMAT, VUMAT, and USDFLD subroutines in Abaqus. They will be equipped with the knowledge and skills to accurately predict composite materials’ failure behavior in various engineering applications.

Lesson1: Types of failure in composites

Lesson 1 of this training package covers the types of failure that can occur in composite materials. These include fiber breakage, fiber buckling, matrix tension, matrix compression, and shearing. Understanding these failure modes is essential for predicting the behavior of composites under different loading conditions, as well as for designing and engineering composite materials that can withstand such conditions. The lesson provides an in-depth explanation of each type of failure, along with their causes and effects, and offers practical examples to illustrate how they can occur in a composite material.

Lesson2: Not dependent failure modes criteria in composites

In Lesson 2 of this training package, we explore the criteria for predicting not-dependent failure modes in composites. This section begins with an introduction to these criteria and their importance in predicting the behavior of composite materials. The lesson then covers three widely used failure criteria: The Tsai-Wu criterion, the Tsai-Hill criterion, and the Hoffman criterion. These criteria are used to predict the onset of failure in composite materials that are not dependent on each other, such as fiber breakage and matrix cracking. The lesson explains each criterion, including its assumptions, mathematical formulations, and practical applications. By the end of this lesson, learners will have a thorough understanding of the not-dependent failure modes criteria in composites and how to use them to predict the failure behavior of such materials.

Lesson3: Dependent failure modes criteria in composites

Lesson 3 of this training package focuses on the criteria for predicting dependent failure modes in composites. This section begins with an introduction to these criteria and their importance in predicting the behavior of composite materials. The lesson then covers two types of failure criteria: non-interactive and interactive. Non-interactive criteria, such as the Maximum Strain and Maximum Stress criteria, are used to predict the failure of individual layers or plies in a composite material. Interactive criteria, such as the Hashin, Puck, and Sun-Tao criteria, are used to predict the interaction between layers or plies and the onset of failure in composite materials. The lesson comprehensively explains each criterion, including its assumptions, mathematical formulations, and practical applications.

Lesson4 : The most practical damage criteria of composites

The Puck criterion is a widely used damage-based criterion for predicting the onset and progression of damage in composite materials. The Puck criterion considers both fiber and matrix failures simultaneously, considering the interaction between them. It provides a practical way to predict the onset of damage in composites under various loading conditions, especially in cases where fiber and matrix failures occur simultaneously. Additionally, the Puck criterion is relatively easy to implement using Abaqus subroutines, making it a practical and efficient way to simulate composite PUCK damage.

1. Fiber failure under tension

Puck damage

2. Fiber failure under compression

Puck damage

3. Matrix failure

Puck damage

Additionally, the Puck criterion is a damage-based criterion, which means it can predict the progression of damage in composites and provide a more accurate estimate of the remaining strength of the material. Therefore, the proper selection and use of the Puck criterion can play a significant role in accurately predicting composite materials’ damage and failure behavior, making it a preferred choice over other failure criteria in many cases.

The Hashin criterion accounts for both tension and compression failure modes in the composite material, including different failure modes in the matrix and fiber directions. It also considers the effect of fiber volume fraction and orientation on the failure behavior of composites. The Hashin criterion has been widely used to predict the failure behavior of composite materials under complex loading conditions, and it is included in many commercial software packages for composite analysis.

1. Fiber failure under tension Puck damage

Puck damage

2. Fiber failure under compressionPuck damage

Puck damage

3. Matrix failure under tensionPuck damage

Puck damage

4. Matrix failure under compressionPuck damage

Puck damage

Workshop 1: Simulation of composite Puck damage in 3d continuum element in Abaqus with UMAT

This workshop focuses on simulating composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements in Abaqus using the UMAT Puck subroutine. The lesson begins with a flowchart of the UMAT Puck subroutine, which outlines the steps needed to simulate the damage behavior of composites using this subroutine. The lesson then covers how to write the UMAT Puck subroutine line by line, providing a detailed explanation of each line and its function.

Finally, the workshop provides learners with a hands-on experience in simulating composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements using the UMAT Puck subroutine. The workshop guides learners through the steps needed to write the UMAT Puck subroutine, validate it using the Abaqus standard solver, and simulate the damage behavior of composites under different loading conditions.

Workshop 2: Simulation of composite Puck damage in 3d continuum element in Abaqus with VUMAT

This workshop focuses on the simulation of composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements in Abaqus using the VUMAT Puck subroutine. The VUMAT subroutine is more versatile than UMAT, and it can handle more complex material models, such as viscoelasticity and damage evolution.

Once the VUMAT Puck subroutine is written, the lesson covers how to validate it using Abaqus explicit solver. This involves running simulations on composite materials and comparing the predicted damage behavior to experimental data. The validation process is important to ensure that the VUMAT Puck subroutine provides accurate predictions of the damage behavior of composites under different loading conditions.

The VUMAT Puck subroutine provides a more advanced and versatile method for simulating composite damage compared to the UMAT Puck subroutine. However, writing and implementing in Abaqus requires a higher level of programming skills.

Workshop 3: Simulation of composite Puck damage in 3d continuum element in Abaqus with USDFLD

This workshop covers the simulation of composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements in Abaqus using the USDFLD Puck subroutine. The lesson begins with a flowchart of the USDFLD Puck subroutine, which outlines the steps needed to simulate the damage behavior of composites using this subroutine. Once the USDFLD Puck subroutine is written, the lesson covers how to validate it using Abaqus standard solver.

By the end of this workshop, learners will have a comprehensive understanding of how to simulate composite Puck damage in 3D continuum elements using the USDFLD Puck subroutine in Abaqus. They will also have practical experience in writing and validating the subroutine, making it a useful tool for predicting the damage behavior of composite materials in various engineering applications.


read more: ddsdde abaqus umat


The Abaqus user subroutine allows the program to be customized for particular applications unavailable through the main Abaqus facilities. You should write a user subroutine if you could not run your analysis by ABAQUS built-in models for materials, loads, properties, elements, etc. for example, if you need to model a user-defined nonlinear stress-strain relation, which is not provided by Abaqus, then look for UMAT user subroutine. A more simple subroutine is USDFLD, which allows the creation of user-defined parameters. If it is your first time writing a subroutine like UMAT, VUMAT or USDFLD please read the Start Writing an Abaqus Subroutine: Basics & Recommendations article. After reading this post and watching this tutorial’s demo video, you will definitely decide to save time in Abaqus modelling and get this training package. If you have questions, ask here on our live chat on the left.

It would be useful to see Abaqus Documentation to understand how it would be hard to start an Abaqus simulation without any Abaqus tutorial. If you are working on Abaqus composite damage and need resources about composite FEM simulation, click on the Abaqus composite analysis page to get more than 20 hours of video training packages of composite materials simulation.

  • What do we learn from this package?
  • Teaching plan and Prerequisites and Next steps
  • Package specification
  • How to model 3d composite materials in ABAQUS?
  • What are the different types of damage initiation criteria for composite materials in ABAQUS?
  • What is the difference between sudden and gradual degradation of mechanical properties for composite materials in ABAQUS?
  • Introduction to different damage initiation and progressive damage theories and equations for composite materials.
  • Fiber breakage
  • Fiber buckling
  • Matrix tension
  • Matrix compression
  • Shearing
  • Introduction
  • Tsai- Wu failure criterion
  • Tsai-Hill failure criterion
  • Hoffman failure criterion
  • Introduction
  • Non-interactive failure criteria
  • Interactive failure criteria
  • Problem Description
  • UMAT Puck subroutine flowchart
  • Writing the subroutine line by line
  • UMAT Puck Subroutine validation with
  • Abaqus solvers
  • Problem Description
  • VUMAT Puck subroutine flowchart
  • Writing the VUMAT puck subroutine line by line
  • VUMAT Puck Subroutine validation with Abaqus solvers
  • Problem Description
  • USDFLD subroutine flowchart
  • Writing the subroutine line by line
  • USDFLD Puck Subroutine validation with Abaqus solvers
Shipping and Delivery
Features

18 reviews for Simulation of composite Puck damage in 3d continuum element in Abaqus (UMAT-USDFLD-VUMAT)

  1. Avatar of henry.sailan

    henry.sailan

    Thank you for preparing this package. your teaching method is such that everyone can understand the content well. I have seen point this in the two packages that I bought from you. Thank you.

  2. Avatar of vili.salvak

    vili.salvak

    The use of three different subroutines (USDFLD, UMAT, and VUMAT) to prepare the 3D continuum puck damage initiation model is impressive. This approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the model and its behavior.

  3. Avatar of eian.sam

    eian.sam

    It’s important to note that the sudden failure of the model after damage initiation is a key aspect of this training package’s focus. This could be particularly useful for designers and engineers who are interested in simulating damage and failure in their models.
    Thank you to your team for preparing this package.

  4. Avatar of Lillian.harper

    Lillian.harper

    I recently purchased this training package and found it to be an excellent resource for anyone interested in customizing Abaqus for a particular application. The package covers all the essential aspects of the Puck Failure Criterion and provides step-by-step guidance on how to use subroutines, also If you have any questions, the live chat support team is very responsive and helpful. thanks.

  5. Avatar of lupi.dave

    lupi.dave

    Is this training package suitable for beginners, or is it more advanced?
    Are there any prerequisites or recommended knowledge or skills for someone who wants to learn from this package?

  6. Avatar of Elyna.reki

    Elyna.reki

    The description of the package does not provide information on the level of detail and complexity of the examples and exercises included. Potential buyers may want to know if the package includes advanced examples or if it is more suitable for beginners. Please look into this matter. Thank you.

  7. Avatar of Lorenzo

    Lorenzo

    For simulating complex composite failure modes such as mixed-mode progressive damage and interactive failure, more accurate methods such as cohesive zone modeling or higher-order finite element methods may be more appropriate than the Puck criterion.

  8. Avatar of luka

    luka

    It would be helpful to include more information about the level of expertise required to fully benefit from this training package .These subroutines require strong programming skills in languages such as Fortran and C++, as well as a deep understanding of finite element analysis.

  9. Avatar of Tanush

    Tanush

    The composite damage simulation package for Abaqus has substantially improved the accuracy and quality of our simulations. This tool provided us with the capability to perform precise damage simulations and obtain useful results.

  10. Avatar of Eshwari

    Eshwari

    The composite damage simulation package for Abaqus has proven to be a powerful tool that meets our needs effectively. This package enabled us to conduct accurate simulations and gain valuable insights into composite damage.
    The provided documentation and guides were well-structured and beneficial, facilitating a quick learning curve. UMAT and VUMAT performed excellently, allowing us to handle complex simulations with precision.

  11. Avatar of Vishwarya

    Vishwarya

    The composite damage simulation package for Abaqus has greatly enhanced the accuracy and quality of our simulations. This tool allowed us to conduct detailed analyses and obtain accurate results for composite damage.

  12. Avatar of Samhita

    Samhita

    The package’s user-friendly documentation and tutorials were very helpful, allowing us to quickly master its features. UMAT and VUMAT’s performance was reliable and accurate, making complex simulations manageable.

    Does the package offer customization options for specific project requirements? Are there plans for future updates and feature additions? Also, is technical support and specialized consultation available for solving complex issues?

  13. Avatar of Rithika

    Rithika

    The composite damage simulation package for Abaqus has significantly improved the quality and accuracy of our simulations. This tool allowed us to perform detailed analyses and obtain reliable results for composite materials.

  14. Avatar of Nivedita

    Nivedita

    The documentation and tutorials provided with the package were excellent, making it easy to understand and utilize the various features. UMAT and VUMAT performed exceptionally well, allowing us to conduct complex simulations with high accuracy.
    Are there regular updates for this package that include new features? If we need to customize the package for larger projects, is there an option for doing so? Additionally, is there support available for technical issues and expert advice?

  15. Avatar of Vaidik

    Vaidik

    After using the composite damage simulation package for Abaqus, I can confidently say that this tool has fully met our expectations. In a recent project where we faced the challenge of simulating various types of damage in composites, this package allowed us to model material behavior accurately and reliably.

  16. Avatar of Suryansh

    Suryansh

    The composite damage simulation package for Abaqus has proven to be an outstanding tool, fully addressing our needs. In various projects involving composite materials, this package enabled us to perform precise and reliable analyses. This tool was particularly useful for simulating damage due to complex and non-uniform loading conditions.
    Another highlight of this package is its user-friendliness. The documentation and tutorials were very clear and helped us get up to speed quickly. UMAT and VUMAT performed exceptionally well, providing valuable results for product design and optimization.

  17. Avatar of Raghuraj

    Raghuraj

    The composite damage simulation package for Abaqus has fully met our expectations, allowing us to achieve highly accurate results in analyzing various types of damage. This tool provided us with the capability to conduct complex simulations and evaluate the behavior of composites under different conditions.

  18. Avatar of Yashodhan

    Yashodhan

    Using the composite damage simulation package for Abaqus was a highly positive experience. This tool allowed us to perform complex simulations with significantly improved accuracy. One of the standout features of this package is its ability to simulate various types of damage and analyze material behavior under different conditions, which has been very valuable for our projects.

    The documentation and educational resources provided were detailed and helpful, facilitating a quick adaptation to the tool. UMAT and VUMAT’s performance was particularly noteworthy, allowing us to achieve precise results in our damage simulations.

Add a review
SKU: AE5566-1-3 Categories: , Tags: , , , , ,